ARTYKUŁ
Different Paths of State Institutions Development – Convergence and Divergence in Post-Socialist Countries
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Instytut Ekonomii
Katedra Makroekonomii i Badań nad Rozwojem, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Polska
				 
			 
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
			
			 
			Submission date: 2024-08-30
			 
		 		
		
			
			 
			Final revision date: 2025-01-06
			 
		 		
		
		
			
			 
			Acceptance date: 2025-01-15
			 
		 		
		
			
			 
			Online publication date: 2025-03-29
			 
		 		
		
			
			 
			Publication date: 2025-03-29
			 
		 			
		 
	
							
					    		
    			 
    			
    				    					Corresponding author
    					    				    				
    					Bartosz  Totleben   
    					Instytut Ekonomii, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875, Poznań, Polska
    				
 
    			
				 
    			 
    		 		
			
												 
		
	 
		
 
 
Ekonomista 2025;(1):107-129
		
 
 
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
This study analyses the evolution of state institutions in 18 Central and Eastern European countries that have transitioned from
authoritarian, centrally planned economies to democratic market economies. The aim is to assess the quality of their state institutions
vis-à-vis those of the EU-15 and to evaluate and compare the levels of socio-economic development in countries whose
convergences have followed different paths. To this end, an index to assess institutional quality was developed; one that incorporates
political freedom, economic freedom, and governance quality. Sigma convergence analysis and cluster analysis were employed
to identify paths of convergence and divergence. Estonia and the Czech Republic were shown to have made significant progress,
while Russia and Belarus have lagged behind. Each country was assigned to one of five groups on the basis of similar convergence
characteristics. Changes in GDP per capita and the HDI within the identified groups were subsequently examined. Despite overall
progress, substantial disparities in institutional quality and socio-economic development persist in CEE.
		
	
		
    
    FUNDING
    
    	Supported by funds granted by the Minister of Science of the Republic of Poland
under the „Regional Initiative for Excellence” Programme for the implementation
of the project “The Poznań University of Economics and Business for Economy 5.0:
Regional Initiative – Global Effects (RIGE)”.